top of page
Search

The historical origins of Trumpism (5)

  • highbrandon202
  • Feb 18, 2021
  • 2 min read

Updated: Feb 24, 2021

After having drawn attention to the sharp and unyielding division in American politics between a regimented Republican Party and the diverse Democrats (thus conforming to the historic model of an American political party), it might seem paradoxical to point out that Trumpism was in fact the product of a striking degree of ideological convergence between the two parties, and of the consequent frustration of many Americans with this situation. However, I am going to propose precisely this argument.

A simple political fact has to be borne in mind, the implications of which are often overlooked. Despite the obvious trend to an ideological monoculture in the Republican Party, it has to appeal to diverse groups of voters. It could never win elections by appealing solely to upper middle class 'country club' Republicans, or fiscal conservatives, or Christian evangelicals. It has always had to appeal to 'blue collar' voters. The contribution of Trumpism has been to graft economic nationalism, nativism and isolationism on to the New Right's preoccupations, namely deregulation, reducing taxes for the wealthy, protecting corporate interests, high defence expenditure ; and, in foreign policy Christian Zionism (as evidenced by Trump's and Pompeo's close relationship with Netanyahu). Therefore, Trump supplied something which was missing from the electoral appeal of the Bushes, John McCain and Mitt Romney.

It is important to emphasise that much of the dispute between Democrats and Republicans has centred on 'culture war' issues (e.g. abortion ; capital punishment ; affirmative action), and not on economic issues. Despite their pro-labour rhetoric, the Democrats have not rolled back anti-labour legislation from Reagan onwards. Until Biden, from the early 1970s onwards the Democrats had effectively abandoned the pro-labour, pro-welfare policies which they had embraced from the New Deal through to the Great Society (See Thomas Frank, 'What's the matter with Kansas ?' (2004), 'Listen, liberal' (2016) ; Steve Fraser (ed.) 'The rise and fall of the New Deal order' (1989) ). Similarly, to many Americans, both parties had pursued policies of military intervention. As a result of Nixon's abolition of the draft in 1972, the experience of military life became sharply differentiated by class (Andrew Bacevich, 'The new American militarism' (2005)). Working class Americans went away to fight, and they felt forgotten. It is not surprising that those at the sharp end of 'deindustrialisation' and military service abroad turned to Trumpism.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Back to 'normality' ?

Almost everybody is talking about returning to 'normal' after the pandemic, which, over most of the world, is still raging. However, the...

 
 
 

2 Comments


wix
Feb 19, 2021

Trying to clarify last sentence of first para of my comment just now, 'Despite being abandoned by the DNC, the majority'.... I mean of course the paradoxical reaction of a substantial fraction of the economic majority. I wasn't of course suggesting a majority of voters in Nov 2020 had supported the man who suggested injecting disinfectant, but somehow been subverted by Hugo Chavez reaching out from beyond the grave and the entire judiciary in multiple states being either hypnotised into not seeing it or themselves replaced by alien lizards.

Like

wix
Feb 19, 2021

This all seems a very plausible perspective, and informed by more US history than I've ever read (most of these titles are books despite not being in italics). Have you read Timothy Snyder's recent article 'American Abyss', suggesting the Republican elite is still heterogeneous, being split between 'gamers' and 'breakers', apparently more than a tactical distinction? That's probably represented on the ground as well, with many asking how moderate Republican voters will react to continued nationalism and increasing inequality. 'not surprising' could do with more elaboration. Despite being abandoned by the DNC, a [edit: substantial fraction of the economic] majority have been induced to vote, if at all, for a party that even less represents their interests.


Trump knew how…


Like
Post: Blog2_Post

01763 245746

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

©2020 by Untimely Meditations. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page